Access Required

Before you begin

Please share your details to access the Warehouse Operations Benchmarking & Compliance Tool. All fields are required.

Privacy. Your contact details and assessment results are securely stored for benchmarking and follow-up purposes. Nothing is shared with third parties.
Open-source tool designed by FreightFox.ai. Consult subject-matter experts or the FreightFox team for deeper interpretation.
SOP-Aligned Self-Assessment

Warehouse Operations
Benchmarking & Compliance

Issue  v1.0 / 2026
Framework  DTAC SOPs (2020)
Coverage  15 Sub-Areas / 106 Controls

A self-service diagnostic for warehouse managers, auditors and supply chain leaders. Score your operation across three pillars — Inbound, Fulfilment and Maintenance — aligned to the Indo-Pacific Health & Supply Chain DTAC Warehouse SOP framework. Receive an instant compliance tier, sub-area heat-map, KPI gap analysis and a structured remediation plan.

Organisation & Assessor

Step 01 / 04

Identify the warehouse and the person performing the assessment. The date is auto-populated and the assessment ID is generated for traceability.

Compliance Self-Assessment

Step 02 / 04

Score each control on a 0–3 maturity scale. Use Not Applicable for controls that genuinely do not apply (e.g. cold chain in an ambient-only facility). N/A items are excluded from your score.

Operational KPIs

Step 03 / 04

Provide your warehouse’s actual performance metrics. These are benchmarked against SOP-recommended targets in your final report. Leave blank if not currently measured.

A reference guide explaining how this tool scores warehouse maturity, what each tier means, how KPIs are evaluated, and the limitations you should bear in mind when interpreting the results.

About this tool

This Warehouse Operations Benchmarking & Compliance Tool is an open-source diagnostic designed and maintained by FreightFox.ai. It is offered freely to warehouse operators, supply chain leaders and auditors as a structured first look at operational maturity.

It is not a substitute for professional audit. Self-assessment results reflect the assessor’s view at a single point in time and may not capture every nuance of your operation. For deeper interpretation, gap remediation, implementation support or independent review, please consult internal subject-matter experts or reach out to the FreightFox team.

01 Framework Origin

Where the SOPs come from and who they were written for.

The control framework underlying this tool is derived from the Warehouse Standard Operating Procedures (2020) published by the Indo-Pacific Health & Supply Chain Data & Technical Assistance Centre (DTAC), in consultation with The mSupply Foundation and Beyond Essential Systems.

The original SOPs were designed for National Medical Stores in Pacific Island Countries managing health commodities through the mSupply electronic Logistics Management System (eLMIS). For this tool, the framework has been generalised and re-phrased to apply to any warehouse operation — pharmaceutical, FMCG, manufacturing, e-commerce, 3PL, cold chain, or hazardous goods. SOP-specific terminology (e.g. “mSupply”, “DDA Coordinator”) has been retained where it adds clarity and replaced with generic equivalents (“WMS”, “Controlled Substances Coordinator”) elsewhere.

02 Structure & Coverage

Three pillars, fifteen sub-areas, one hundred and six controls.

  • Pillar A — Inbound Operations (6 sub-areas): Preparation for Goods Receipt, Customs Clearance, Goods Arrival, Goods Inspection, Goods Receipt (System Entry), Supplier Payments.
  • Pillar B — Order Fulfilment (3 sub-areas): Order Processing, Picking & Assembling, Dispatch & Distribution.
  • Pillar C — Warehouse Maintenance (6 sub-areas): Warehouse Storage, Storage Conditions, Stocktakes, Expiring Items, Supplementary Orders, Security.
  • Total: 106 individual controls spread across the 15 sub-areas, plus 10 operational KPIs with SOP-derived targets.

03 Maturity Scoring Scale

A 0–3 scale per control. N/A items are excluded from the denominator.

ScoreLevelMeaning
3Fully ImplementedProcess is documented, consistently followed, and actively monitored with KPI tracking.
2Mostly ImplementedProcess is in place with minor gaps in execution, documentation, or monitoring frequency.
1Partially ImplementedProcess exists in ad-hoc form or is planned but not consistently practised.
0Not ImplementedNo process, no documentation, no consistent practice for this control.
N/ANot ApplicableControl genuinely does not apply to your operation (e.g. cold chain in an ambient-only facility). Excluded from scoring.

04 Score Aggregation

How sub-area, pillar and overall percentages are calculated.

  • Sub-area % = (sum of scores) ÷ (number of applicable controls × 3) × 100. N/A controls are excluded from both numerator and denominator.
  • Pillar % aggregates all applicable controls in the pillar — not an average of sub-area percentages. This means a sub-area with more controls carries proportionally more weight.
  • Overall % aggregates all applicable controls across the entire framework using the same control-weighted method.
  • Equal weighting per control is intentional — no single control is privileged over another. If your operation considers some controls more critical, treat the report as a starting point for prioritised discussion rather than a definitive ranking.

05 Maturity Tiers

Where you land on the overall percentage determines your maturity tier.

RangeTierInterpretation
90–100%Best-in-ClassMature, monitored and continuously improving. Sustain through internal audit and peer benchmarking.
75–89%CompliantSolid SOP adherence with isolated gaps. Focus on closing the lowest-scoring sub-areas.
60–74%DevelopingFoundation in place but execution inconsistent. Prioritise documentation, training and KPI tracking.
40–59%Needs ImprovementSignificant gaps across multiple SOP areas. A structured corrective action plan with clear ownership is needed.
0–39%Critical GapFoundational controls missing. Immediate executive attention required — stock integrity, compliance and safety may be at risk.

06 KPI Evaluation

Each KPI is benchmarked against an SOP-derived target with three possible statuses.

  • Meets Target (green) — Reported value is on or better than the SOP target.
  • Below Target (amber) — Reported value falls between the SOP target and a mid-threshold; meaningful improvement is required.
  • Critical Gap (red) — Reported value is worse than the mid-threshold; remediation is urgent.
  • Not Reported (grey) — KPI was left blank. Consider this a measurement maturity gap in itself.

KPI targets are taken from the SOP’s “Performance Indicators” sections — for example, the SOP recommends customs clearance within 7 days, monthly 20-item random audits, and ≥95% availability of critical items. A complete list of KPIs and their targets is shown on Step 3 of the assessment.

07 Limitations & Caveats

What this tool can and cannot tell you.

  • Self-reported, not independently audited. Results reflect the assessor’s perception. An external audit may surface different findings.
  • Subjective interpretation. Several controls require honest, informed judgement about what counts as “mostly” vs “fully” implemented. Two assessors at the same warehouse may score slightly differently.
  • Snapshot in time. A score taken today reflects today’s state. Operations drift — we recommend re-assessment at least quarterly.
  • Equal control weighting. If your business model treats certain controls (e.g. cold chain integrity, controlled substance handling) as critical, treat low scores there as priority regardless of overall percentage.
  • Not a regulatory submission. This tool does not replace WHO Good Storage and Distribution Practices (GSDP), GMP, GDP, ISO 9001, FSSAI, or any jurisdiction-specific compliance audit. It is a complement, not a substitute.
  • Sector adaptation. Some controls (e.g. cold chain temperature ranges, vaccine arrival reports) are health-sector specific. Use the N/A option liberally where controls do not apply.

08 Recommended Use

How to get the most out of this tool.

  • Initial baseline. Use it to establish where your warehouse stands today and identify the top 5 priority gaps.
  • Internal audit preparation. Run it before a scheduled audit to spot likely findings and address them in advance.
  • Vendor / 3PL evaluation. Have prospective logistics partners self-assess and submit the JSON for comparative review.
  • Quarterly maturity tracking. Re-run every 90 days to track drift, validate remediation, and demonstrate progress to leadership.
  • M&A or due diligence. Use as a structured first-pass operational review of a target warehouse network.
  • Training tool. Walk team leaders through the controls in their section to clarify expected practice.

09 Source & Attribution

  • Source framework: Warehouse Standard Operating Procedures, 2020. Indo-Pacific Health & Supply Chain Data & Technical Assistance Centre (DTAC).
  • Co-authors of original SOPs: The mSupply Foundation; Beyond Essential Systems.
  • Tool design & engineering: FreightFox.ai — freight intelligence platform for Indian manufacturers.
  • Open source: Released for free use by the warehouse and supply chain community. Embed it on your own internal site, share with peers, or use it as a starting point for a tailored audit framework.
  • Feedback & contributions: Reach out to the FreightFox team for improvements, sector-specific extensions, or implementation support.
Designed by FreightFox.ai